Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories


Supporter Shops:

Toque Snuff Shop

Snuff Store

Dholakia

Snuffhouse.org uses Vanilla 1.1.2

Welcome Guest!
Want to take part in these discussions? If you have an account, sign in now.
If you don't have an account, apply for one now.
    •  
      CommentAuthorTroutstroker
    • CommentTimeAug 15th 2008 edited
     # 1
    This has been on the news all morning with a press conference & they are releasing DNA & photographic evidence to the press. These guys say they found this "bigfoot" dead while hiking in Georgia. They brought it back and put it in a freezer. It was 7 foot 7 inches tall and over 500 pounds. They say there were 3 other "bigfoot creatures" walking around the area trying not to be seen. They are having it analyzed to find out what it is. If its genuine, if its a type of ape or just a hoax. So what do you guys think? Real, misidentified or just a hoax.

    Bigfoot Found
    •  
      CommentAuthorRoderick
    • CommentTimeAug 15th 2008
     # 2
    The most amazing thing was that they found a 10 gram tin of Toque chocolate in his hand! Everyone knows Bigfoot’s hate chocolate!
    • CommentAuthorsnuffster
    • CommentTimeAug 15th 2008
     # 3
    Why is it that all flying saucers, aliens, ghosts, yetis and the like are only captured on grainy film, as mummified remains etc etc. Cos they don't exist is why. The DNA will come back ape, just like the 'Humanzee' came back chimp and the Russian peasant woman with a Neanderthal mother came back human - albeit an unfortunately strange looking one.

    Its all, as we Brits say, bollocks. Symptomatic of a need to have mystery and just a little bit more than you can see in everyday life. It's been said that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof and proof is the difference between established fact and myth. When the DNA on this comes back as ape they will say its been contaminated or something, keeping the myth alive in the process.

    I would love this stuff to exist, it would make a world we increasingly understand only too well a bit more fun, but I'm not holding my breath. If the spooky things were real they wouldn't be so elusive.

    I bet the Discovery channel are in this somewhere...
  1.  # 4
    Its hard to say what is out there that hasn't been discovered yet as we are still discovering new species of life every day. There is so much of the world that is still virtually unexplored. I know there are mountainous regions in the US & Canada that are so remote that they have never had humans walk through them. There are areas like this all over the world. Still a lot to be discovered especially in the Oceans. Just back in February they found a completely new species of monkey in the Amazon and the same month 2 new species of sharks where found off the coast of Australia. Just last week an unknown population of over 100,000 gorillas where found in the Congo. These recently discovered species have stayed virtually unknown because they have been elusive & thats how they survive. I think its entirely possible for there to be a real bigfoot type creature yet to be discovered. I too would love it if these things turn out to be true snuffster. And if this one does turn out to be true, they do have the body so that would be pretty cool. But as you, I'm not holding my breath until the study has been completed and announced to the world.

    I know there used to be a a creature called Gigantopithecus that lived in Southeast Asia which is known as the 'real king kong' that could have been called 'bigfoot'. It stood over 10 feet tall.

    This is Gigantopithecus which was reconstructed from bones found. With a vast wilderness still yet to be explored, who's to say something like this really is extinct.

    • CommentAuthorsnuffster
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 5
    Oh I know, and agree that there's stuff we don't know and take your point entirely - it's possible, but I still think it's wishful thinking until someone comes up with the goods. I think there is a difference between finding new species of shark and monkeys - they are variations of what we already know and the differences are subtle, but moreover they were found, not postulated about for generations in folk stories. The point is that we never find the other stuff, it's always third hand reports, grainy film and the rest.

    I base most of my thoughts on this type of issue simply on precedent - when they look for the most elusive snow tiger or whatever to film, it might take an age, but they find it because it's there to be found. Whenever anyone looks for the spooky stuff, they never find it. I saw a documentary about a British guy who went off searching for the yeti, followed all the local lore and tracked down a wiseman who gave directions to the yetis cave - nothing there, just myth, and the mummified yeti in a monastry was a monkey. We often have a default view that folklore is accurate - which is ultimately where Bigfoot and his various buddies across the globe started - but our great, great, great granfathers also told stories for the fun of it as well, and a lot have grown courtesy of our selves.

    I would still love for it to be true though, although I would not trust big money not to capture the poor old guy and put him om display in Time Square.

    Nice Gigantopithecus. No one would hussle him at pool and he could probably get away with taling about fags in SF. Then again, I'm judging him on looks..he might be very....sensitive?
    •  
      CommentAuthorbob
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 6
    I think if you want mystery and wonder all you've really got to do is pay a little closer attention because life is pretty strange. Even the most mundaune thing is filled with tons of mystery we've just have gotten to used to it too see it with fresh eyes.
    As far is cryptozoology goes I don't see any reason that there probably aren't stranger creatures. Think about this for a second as a londoner how much do you associate red foxes with london?? Do you consider them a common london animal??? Foxes are actualy extremely common to london. Here most people refuse to believe there are as many coytoes here as there truely are. Most people don't even think bobcats live in my neck of the woods even though they are relativly common (the only ones people ever seem to see are dead). People refuse to believe that mountain lions may still live in PA yet there is evidence they may. My point is there is so much of the world that we really don't see even though it's common why isn't there a good chance that at least a few strange possibly mythic animals really do exsist.
    •  
      CommentAuthorLazarus
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 7
    The experts aren't convinced...

    Jeffery Meldrum, a Bigfoot researcher and Idaho State University professor said:

    "What I've seen so far is not compelling in the least, and I think the pictures cast grave doubts on their claim, It just looks like a costume with some fake guts thrown on top for effect"

    Which is exactly what I think too...Its just the same as all the other hoaxes we've been exposed to over the years. Area 51, the Loch Ness Monster. As Snuffster aready said we just love mystery.
    • CommentAuthorsnuffster
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 8
    I take all these points, just have a basic difficulty because no one can ever actually produce a bigfoot, yet or decent picture of a ghost. I think I have an open mind, but just waiting for the day when someone can prove soemthing rather than just theorise.

    I do agree there is vast amounts of mystery that we overlook all around us. Good point about foxes, you see them late at night but never do associate them with the city for some reason.
    •  
      CommentAuthorbob
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 9
    London has a very large population of foxes denser then the english country side.
    • CommentAuthorsnuffster
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 10
    You see them all the time late at night. I can't let my cat out into the back garden at night as there are a couple that live around here. The also fight over garbage bags in the early hours when they are left out for the truck. I'm often woken by what sounds like a child or something screaming and when I look out on the front street I see a couple of them fighting, pretty big ones at that
    •  
      CommentAuthorbob
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 11
    I've never seen them fight except for some pups wrestling when I found a den near my parents house. I thought it was a barn cat at first so I snuck up on them.
    • CommentAuthorsnuffster
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 12
    Its more a lot of shouting at each other and a little snap here and there, I suppose if they've claimed a tasty bit of garbage they don't want to share. They also shit all over my back yard
    •  
      CommentAuthorbob
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 13
    Reminds me of another strange animal the tanuki. They've been traced well into germany yet few germans even know they exsist.
    • CommentAuthorsnuffster
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 14
    I wouldn't know a tanuki if it bit me
  2.  # 15
    Grey & Red foxes are one thing I do see a lot of day and night. Here in the mountains there is a pretty good population. Foxes, coyote, deer, cougars, bobcats, bears, turkey, raccoons, opossums, are what's seen on a pretty regular occasion around here and the occasional porcupine. No chupacabra's though.
    • CommentAuthorsnuffster
    • CommentTimeAug 16th 2008
     # 16
    And a chupacabra is?

    I think I'm right in saying we don't get em in London....
    • CommentAuthorMopey
    • CommentTimeAug 17th 2008
     # 17
    I have been interested in cryptozoology since I was a kid - love the idea of something out there that managed to slip its way past man kinds ever widening nets. Looks like the DNA 'evidence' on this chap has come up as... questionable.
    •  
      CommentAuthorLazarus
    • CommentTimeAug 17th 2008
     # 18
    Apparently there is some evidence to suggest 'Megoladon' survived extinction and is still prowling the deep...you wouldn't want to bump into one of these whilst out for a swim!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalodon#Supposed_C._megalodon_sightings

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Megalodon_scale1.png
    •  
      CommentAuthorbob
    • CommentTimeAug 17th 2008
     # 19
    Sure you would if it was on dry land maybe.
  3.  # 20
    snuffster, the chupacabra is creature ranging from Puerto Rico & Mexico and into the southern US. Its name stands for "goat sucker". Its notorious for killing livestock and sucking the body dry of blood.
    • CommentAuthorsnuffster
    • CommentTimeAug 18th 2008
     # 21
    Aah, one of them.
    •  
      CommentAuthornightcap
    • CommentTimeAug 18th 2008
     # 22
    A "SAMSQACH" EH?

    WEll,
    All I can say is that photo did look a little lame.
    Kind of like a Planet of the Apes mask.
    I would like to see a higher quality shot.
    And see the report on the DNA study.
    I used to "study" Sasquatch back in College as a hobby.
    Mind you I also used to watch Sightings and X-files every chance I got.
    Plus I went out and bought that stupid Alien autopsy DVD.

    But at the end of the day..........
    Chewy is the coolest!!!
    I guess I'm a sucker for teh unknown.
      wookie.jpg
    •  
      CommentAuthorTroutstroker
    • CommentTimeAug 18th 2008 edited
     # 23
    Of course bigfoot is real nightcap. Don't you remember the movie "Harry & the Hendersons". Aliens are real too. I remember the movie "Howard the Duck" & the tv show ALF.

    •  
      CommentAuthorbigblue1
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2008
     # 24
    Since we're talking about monsters here's a nice one my brother-In-law Landed on Saturday night. Around 34 inche and over 20Lbs.
    •  
      CommentAuthorbigblue1
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2008
     # 25
    Sorry couldn't attach picture. I'll try to figure out why.
    •  
      CommentAuthorbigblue1
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2008
     # 26
    http://i533.photobucket.com/albums/ee338/carguy148/GEDC0418.jpg
  4.  # 27
    Here you go bigblue1 I loaded the picture for you, tell your brother-in-law well done.


    •  
      CommentAuthorbigblue1
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2008
     # 28
    I will, but I must say I netted it. Anyway how did you do it for next time. " giv a kid a fish feed him for a day teach a kid to fish feed him for a life" And thanks alot troutstoker....
    •  
      CommentAuthorbigblue1
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2008
     # 29
    I'll try now. Thanks once again buddy..
    •  
      CommentAuthornightcap
    • CommentTimeAug 19th 2008
     # 30
    NICE!!